Monthly Archive for October, 2010

UK: Massive Cuts Raise Spectre of Student Outflux

From Diane Spencer and Brendan O’Malley, in University World News

The coalition government is cutting the higher education budget by 40%. But science, technology, engineering and maths – the Stem subjects – will be protected, as will the budget for scientific research.

The budget will be reduced from £7.1 billion to £4.2 billion (US$11.2 billion to US$6.6 billion) by 2014-15.

Universities UK president Steve Smith (above) said the cuts would mean the biggest change in the sector for more than 40 years and state funding would be withdrawn for teaching in many subjects. The arts and humanities appear to be the most vulnerable and there would be serious repercussions for British universities in the overseas market.

To read more…

Journal of the World Universities Forum: Recently Published

universities

The latest issue of the Journal of the World Universities Forum includes:

Big Oil Goes to College: An Analysis of 10 Research Collaboration Contracts Between Leading Energy Companise and Major U.S. Universities

bigoiluniv_onpageBy Jennifer Washburn, in Center for American Progress

The world’s largest oil companies are showing surprising interest in financing alternative energy research at U.S. universities. Over the past decade, five of the world’s top 10 oil companies—ExxonMobil Corp., Chevron Corp., BP PLC, Royal Dutch Shell Group, and ConocoPhillips Co.—and other large traditional energy companies with a direct commercial stake in future energy markets have forged dozens of multi-year, multi-million-dollar alliances with top U.S. universities and scientists to carry out energy-related research. Much of this funding by “Big Oil” is being used for research into new sources of alternative energy and renewable energy, mostly biofuels.

To read more…

Call for Nominations

wuf-logoWe are very pleased to announce that we are now taking nominations for several awards that will be presented at the 2011 world Universities Forum in Hong Kong from 14-16 January, 2011.

World Universities Forum 2010 Higher Education Awards:

The World Universities Forum is accepting nominees for its Higher Education Awards. Award recipients will be invited to attend the 2011 World Universities Forum where they will receive their award during the Forum opening ceremony. Awardees will also be recognized in the World Universities Forum program, press releases, and other forms of publicity.

Award in Best Press:

The Best Press Award recognizes outstanding journalistic reporting in 2010 on higher education topics. Nominees may be higher education news stories from any form of media, and any media outlet, provided the intended audience of the reporting extends beyond the confines of narrow academic or policy specializations. The Award will be granted to individual(s) instrumental to the creation of the news story. Nominations can be made online here.

Award in Best Policy:

The Best Policy Award recognizes the most significant higher education policies of 2010. Nominees may include innovative and/or far-reaching policies established on institutional, local, national or international levels. The Award will be granted to individual(s), group(s), organization(s), or institution(s), etc. instrumental to the formulation of the selected policy. Nominations can be made online here.

Award in the Best Practice:

The Best Practice Award recognizes the most significant higher education practices of 2010. Nominees may include, for example: innovative curricula, research projects, student services, etc. The Award will be granted to the individual(s), group(s), organizations(s), or institution(s), etc. intstrumental to the achievement of these practices. Nominations can be submitted online here.

All nominations are due by November 20, 2010.

A Proposal to Abolish Tuition Caps Divides Britain – and Perhaps Its Government

tuituion_capsBy Aisha Labi, in The Chronicle

Tuition at some British universities could rise to rival the rates at top private American institutions if the proposals by a government-commissioned panel released on Tuesday are adopted. The long-anticipated review, which will help shape the government’s response to a financing crisis facing British universities, encourages a market-oriented approach toward higher education.

The report’s bold tone and wide-ranging recommendations prompted intense reactions across the country. Leading research universities praised its support of substantial tuition increases as necessary for higher education’s survival, while professors and students decried what they called the death of the public university in Britain.

To read more…

Gates Foundation launches $20M effort to improve online college instruction

about_-_overviewFrom Katherine Long in the Seattle Times:

What if you could watch videos of the world’s leading college professors lecture about a difficult subject you were trying to master — online, any time you needed to watch?

That’s one of the ideas that could receive funding from a $20 million initiative unveiled Monday by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The initiative aims to find new ways to deliver college instruction, using technology to make college learning more effective, and possibly also less expensive.

The Next Generation Learning Challenge will provide grants to educators and entrepreneurs to develop more fully promising technology tools. Initially, the grants will focus on classes taken by students in higher education, but in later years it will focus on K-12 learning, said Bill Gates, co-chair of the foundation, in a conference call Monday.

For the article…

For the Next Generation project…

China: Ambitious ‘Innovation Society’ Plan

From Yojana Sharma, in University World News

China hopes to raise the quality and quantity of its graduates in its most ambitious programme ever to grow top talent, raising the gross enrolment rate for universities from around 24% to 40% within 10 years and the number of citizens with college-level education in the work force from 9% to 20% overall.

In the next decade China intends to import top brains as well as produce a new generation of political and local government leaders, engineers, scientists, technology professionals, entrepreneurs, educators, agricultural experts and social welfare experts according to the Medium and Long term Talent Development Plan (2010-2020).

Although the plan was passed by the Beijing Politburo in May this year Chinese officials have begun a campaign to promote it abroad, to emphasise its far-reaching role to convert China into a knowledge-based economy rather than just a manufacturing hub. Officials have stressed the aim is to transform China into an ‘innovation society’.

To read more…

Journal of the World Universities Forum, Volume 3, Number 6 now available

universities_frontThe sixth issue of Volume 3 of the Journal of the World Universities Forum has now been published.

Volume 3, Number 6 contains:

Continue reading ‘Journal of the World Universities Forum, Volume 3, Number 6 now available’

GLOBAL: Rankings Undermined by Flawed Indicator

From Richard Holmes, in Times Higher Education

Times Higher Education said that their new-style ranking would have a few surprises. They were certainly right. There have been so many academic eyebrows rising into the stratosphere that airlines will have to impose flight restrictions.

Nobody, I think, is bothered very much that Harvard is first in the new table or that Oxford and Cambridge have slipped a bit. But many are wondering about Caltech in second place and the London School of Economics in 87th. After all, THE was complaining that the old THE-QS rankings privileged technological universities over those that were strong in the social sciences.

To read more…

Trouble with Numbers

image from Nature.com

image from Nature.com

From Philip Altbach, in Times Higher Education

It might seem a contradiction that widening access would bring inequality to higher education, but trends show that is exactly what happens. Institutions that cater to mass access provide vastly different quality, facilities and focus than do elite institutions, and this gulf has widened as access has expanded worldwide. Furthermore, mass higher education has, for a majority of students, lowered quality and increased dropout rates.

However, even if these consequences have become inevitable and logical, they do not justify a move to reduce access but rather call for a more realistic understanding of the implications of “massification” and the steps needed to improve the problems created by dramatic increases in enrolments.

To read more…