By Patricia Cohen, in The New York Times
For professors, publishing in elite journals is an unavoidable part of university life. The grueling process of subjecting work to the up-or-down judgment of credentialed scholarly peers has been a cornerstone of academic culture since at least the mid-20th century.
Now some humanities scholars have begun to challenge the monopoly that peer review has on admission to career-making journals and, as a consequence, to the charmed circle of tenured academe. They argue that in an era of digital media there is a better way to assess the quality of work.
![[rss]](http://ontheuniversity.com/wp-content/themes/k2_1.0.3/images/feed.png)
0 Responses to “Scholars Test Web Alternative to Peer Review”